In a move that has stirred controversy, former US President Donald Trump issued an executive order to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the “Gulf of America” in official US government documents. The decision, part of a flurry of executive actions signed during his first week in office, was highlighted in his inaugural address on January 20, where Trump declared his intent to restore America’s global dominance. He cited the Gulf’s critical role in US oil production, fishing, and tourism as justification for the change.
The renaming has now reached digital platforms, with Google Maps announcing its plans to implement the name change for US-based users once the United States Geographic Names System (GNIS) updates its records. However, for users in Mexico, the Gulf will remain labeled as the Gulf of Mexico. In other regions, both names will be displayed to reflect the ongoing dispute. Google’s spokesperson reiterated that the platform adheres to official government sources for naming conventions.
Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum responded to the decision with humor, suggesting that North America could be renamed “Mexican America” to reflect the region’s historical ties to Mexico. Despite her light-hearted remark, Sheinbaum emphasized that the Gulf remains “the Gulf of Mexico for the entire world.”
Mount Denali Reverts to Mount McKinley
Another high-profile name change ordered by Trump was the renaming of Mount Denali in Alaska, North America’s tallest peak, to its former name, Mount McKinley. The mountain had been officially renamed Denali in 2015 under the Obama administration to honor Alaska’s Koyukon Athabascans, who have referred to the peak as Denali for thousands of years.
Trump justified the change by invoking former President William McKinley, whom he credited with enriching the United States through tariffs and economic policies. The Interior Department confirmed the change, and Google Maps plans to follow suit, ensuring the mountain is labeled as Mount McKinley for US users.
The decision has drawn criticism from indigenous organizations and political figures, including Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski. She argued that the Denali name reflects the deep cultural and historical ties of Alaska Natives to the region. “Our nation’s tallest mountain must continue to be known by the rightful name bestowed by Alaska’s first stewards,” Murkowski stated, adding that the name Denali carries significant cultural weight.
Broader Implications of Renaming Decisions
Trump’s renaming orders have sparked diplomatic tensions and cultural debates. The name “Gulf of America” has already been adopted by the US Coast Guard in official statements about border enforcement and by Florida Governor Ron DeSantis during a weather-related briefing. Critics argue that the move represents a broader effort to assert American dominance at the expense of regional and indigenous identities.
Read More: Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani Criticizes 26th Amendment for Undermining Judicial Independence
Google’s naming practices have previously faced scrutiny in other geopolitical disputes. For instance, it lists the body of water between Japan and South Korea as the “Sea of Japan (East Sea)” to accommodate competing claims. Similarly, it labels the Persian Gulf as “Persian Gulf (Arabian Gulf)” in some regions to address differing perspectives.
The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico and Mount Denali underscores the complex interplay of national pride, cultural heritage, and international diplomacy. While the changes are intended to bolster a sense of American identity, they have highlighted longstanding cultural and historical disputes, raising questions about the implications of unilateral renaming decisions.
Cultural and Diplomatic Fallout
The backlash to Trump’s orders extends beyond semantics. Indigenous groups in Alaska and Mexican leaders view the changes as dismissive of their cultural and historical significance. The Gulf of Mexico has been a key part of Mexico’s identity, while Denali holds sacred status among Alaska Natives.
As debates over these renamings continue, they serve as a reminder of how geographic names carry deep political, cultural, and historical weight. Whether these changes achieve Trump’s vision of strengthening America’s global standing remains to be seen, but their ripple effects on diplomacy and cultural identity are already evident.