NASA has come under intense scrutiny in recent weeks for its adherence to executive orders issued by U.S. President Donald Trump. These orders, which affect all federal organizations, have led the space agency to end its Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA) initiatives. Additionally, NASA has been instructed to remove any references to DEIA from its websites, as well as to eliminate mentions of “Indigenous People,” “Environmental Justice,” and “Women in Leadership” from its materials.
An internal memo, based on directives from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM), warned employees that failing to comply with these changes or failing to report colleagues attempting to subvert the orders could lead to “adverse consequences.” Many NASA employees and contractors have expressed fear and frustration over these changes, with some reportedly being told to “drop everything” and scrub websites immediately.
Reports of LGBTQI+ Pride Symbol Bans
Amid the broader rollback of DEIA efforts, reports surfaced that NASA employees were being told to remove LGBTQI+ Pride symbols from their workspaces, including flags, pins, and digital backgrounds. NASA Watch, a website monitoring the agency, cited anonymous sources claiming that employees faced penalties, including administrative leave, for displaying such items.
Read More: NASA launches new telescope that could outperform JWST
NASA has since denied implementing a formal ban, with a spokesperson stating: “There are no new bans on any personal affects in employees’ workspaces. As always, the items must adhere to legal, safety, and NASA rules and guidelines.” However, sources claim that the directive was given verbally rather than in writing, leaving employees uncertain about what they can and cannot display.
Democratic lawmakers Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Valerie Foushee (D-NC) strongly condemned the reported restrictions, calling them a “ridiculous overstep and direct assault on NASA HQ employees’ free speech and humanity.” They further criticized what they described as “government-sanctioned censorship” and warned that it represents an erosion of federal employees’ rights.
Workforce Concerns and Morale at NASA
Beyond DEIA rollbacks, NASA is also facing workforce challenges due to Trump’s executive orders. The administration has implemented federal workforce cuts through buyouts and mandates requiring employees to return to in-person work, exacerbating pre-existing staffing shortages. Reports indicate that NASA’s ability to maintain operations on the International Space Station (ISS) and pursue its ambitious Moon and Mars missions may be at risk due to these reductions.
“Mission control already struggles with certifying and retaining flight controllers, but this is sure to make things worse,” one former NASA mission control worker stated. The complex work of keeping the ISS operational requires highly trained staff, and sources warn that ongoing staff reductions could compromise astronaut safety.
NASA’s internal safety panel recently advised the agency to reconsider the timeline for its Moon missions, given the lack of flight-tested spacesuits, lunar landers, and heat shields. However, Trump remains firm in his goal of sending astronauts to Mars before the end of his term, increasing pressure on an already strained workforce.
Broader Scientific Community Reactions
NASA is not the only federally funded scientific organization complying with these executive orders. The Rubin Observatory, named after astronomer Vera Rubin, has altered website content to remove references to her advocacy for women in science.
Read More: Could Asteroid 2024 YR4 strike Earth in 2032?
Greg Chamitoff, a former NASA astronaut, criticized Trump’s actions, calling them “disastrous for our country” and warning that they could have long-term consequences for NASA’s workforce and projects. Libby Jackson, former head of space exploration at the UK Space Agency, argued that diversity is crucial for scientific progress. “Any good team is built on diversity of opinion,” she said, pointing out that NASA’s past failures, such as the Challenger and Columbia disasters, were linked to “groupthink” and a lack of diverse perspectives.