New York University (NYU) has suspended 11 students for a year following their participation in non-violent, pro-Palestine protests last month, according to the NYU Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine (NYUFSJP). The suspensions, effective until January 2026, have drawn widespread condemnation, with critics describing the university’s response as collective punishment and an attack on free speech.
The protests, held on December 11, included sit-ins at Bobst Library, where students demanded transparency regarding NYU’s financial ties to Israel and divestment from companies linked to its occupation of Palestine. While university administrators claimed the protest caused “a significant disruptive impact,” participants characterized their actions as minor disruptions, such as distributing flyers and chanting briefly.
Two faculty members present at the protest were arrested, although they reportedly attended to ensure student safety. Additionally, three other faculty members were declared personae non gratae (PNG), barring them from campus, including their own classrooms.
Controversy Over Disciplinary Action
The university justified its disciplinary measures by citing “threatening messages” found in the library the same day, but NYUFSJP maintains there is no evidence linking the graffiti to the protesters. Instead, they argue the punishments reflect “a complete collapse in due process,” with students penalized collectively for engaging in peaceful activism.
Read More: Sheikh Hasina’s Passport Revoked, Arrest Warrants Issued
The protests were organized by Shut It Down NYU, a student group opposing the university’s alleged ties to imperialism. Participants had previously called for NYU to disclose its investments in weapons manufacturers and companies profiting from Israel’s occupation of Palestine. The group criticized NYU for reneging on promises made during earlier protests to share details of its endowment.
NYUFSJP has denounced the university’s actions as an attack on legitimate political expression. “The extreme sanctions… are dramatically more severe than those issued over the past fifteen months,” the group stated, accusing NYU of using a “dangerous smear tactic” to delegitimize the student movement.
Outrage and Calls for Accountability
The suspensions have sparked backlash on social media and from academics worldwide. Amanda Wise, a sociology professor in Sydney, called the move an “extraordinary repression of legitimate political speech.” Katherine Blouin, a professor at the University of Toronto, questioned, “Who is this McCarthyist repression of students serving?” Writer Layla Saliba went further, urging the academic community to boycott NYU.
The protest coincided with Israel’s ongoing assault on Gaza, which has claimed over 45,000 Palestinian lives, according to reports. Activists argue that NYU’s punitive actions overshadow the devastation in Gaza, where Israel’s bombardment has reduced universities, schools, libraries, and archives to rubble. A recent resolution by the American Historical Association condemned the destruction of educational institutions in Gaza, terming it “scholasticide.”
Despite its policy claiming to support “organized, nonviolent, peaceful protest,” NYU’s administration has been accused of hypocrisy. NYUFSJP highlighted the university’s weaponization of its conduct policy to stifle speech on Palestine, undermining its reputation as a global institution committed to academic freedom.
Broader Implications for Activism
The suspensions follow months of protests across U.S. campuses against what many activists describe as Israel’s genocide in Gaza. NYU’s actions reflect a growing trend of crackdowns on pro-Palestine activism, often described as the “Palestine exception” to free speech. Critics warn such measures threaten not only student activism but also academic freedom at large.
As disciplinary proceedings against more NYU students loom, calls for accountability continue to grow. Advocates stress the importance of protecting students’ rights to dissent, especially in the face of what they see as complicity in global injustices. Whether NYU reconsiders its stance remains uncertain, but the case has undoubtedly reignited debates about free speech and institutional transparency.