Rana Ahsan Afzal, a coordinator for Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, recently made headlines during a news talk show by accusing 60 U.S. Congress members of accepting “dollars” from lobbyists linked to the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. This serious allegation implies that these lawmakers were bribed to endorse a letter requesting the release of political prisoners in Pakistan, including former Prime Minister Imran Khan who is currently incarcerated. Such statements not only reflect a deep-seated suspicion regarding foreign influences but also highlight the lengths the Pakistani government may go to undermine genuine international concern about human rights violations.
“60 US Congressmen have taken the money from lobbyists to sign the letter asking for release of political prisoners in Pakistan.”
I had to watch it twice, because I thought I misheard the illegitimate Form 47 Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif’s Coordinator, Rana Ahsan Afzal.
It… pic.twitter.com/BVhFSUS7Ya
— Jehanzeb Paracha (@JehanzebParacha) November 1, 2024
Congressional Letter
The initiative led by U.S. Congressman Greg Casar has garnered attention for addressing serious human rights violations allegedly perpetrated by Pakistan’s military, particularly against Army Chief General Asim Munir. Signed by 62 members, this letter calls for concrete actions from the U.S. government, including sanctions, travel bans, and asset freezes against military officials involved in political oppression. This bipartisan effort underscores a growing awareness of the political crisis in Pakistan and signifies a critical moment in U.S.-Pakistan relations.
Today, I led over 60 Members of Congress in a letter supporting human rights & democracy in Pakistan and calling for the release of political prisoners — including former Prime Minister Imran Khan.
— Congressman Greg Casar (@RepCasar) October 23, 2024
Furthermore, the letter reflects the international community’s commitment to democratic principles and human rights. It directly demands the release of political prisoners, including Imran Khan, whose treatment is emblematic of broader governance issues in Pakistan. By highlighting these concerns, U.S. lawmakers reinforce the message that human rights abuses require accountability, emphasizing that the actions of Pakistan’s military leadership will have significant repercussions.
Government’s Letter to PM Shehbaz Sharif
In response to the Congressional letter, Pakistani parliamentarians issued their own missive, deeming the U.S. concerns “inaccurate” and “unwarranted.” Instead of addressing the substantive points raised, this counterletter largely seeks to defend the actions of the Pakistani military and diminish the urgency for reform. This approach demonstrates a reluctance to address the democratic and human rights issues that have attracted international scrutiny.
Read More: Pakistani Parliamentarians Attempt to Counter Greg Casar’s Letter by Writing to PM Shehbaz Sharif
The establishment-backed government’s rhetoric seem to embody a strategy of deflection, redirecting attention from the pressing human rights concerns articulated by U.S. lawmakers. By framing the Congressional letter as a product of “political propaganda” from supporters of Imran Khan, the government sidesteps its responsibility to address allegations against military leadership. This tactic not only undermines the government’s credibility but also raises questions about its commitment to democratic principles.
They are this desperate to keep Imran Khan in jail!
Spokesperson to Govt of Pakistan & Focal Person to PM Shahbaz Sharif, stating on live TV that 60 congresspersons must have accepted bribes from lobbyists to write a letter in support of human rights & democracy in Pakistan. pic.twitter.com/WQvOff86f6— Taimur Saleem Khan Jhagra (@Jhagra) November 1, 2024
The Dangers of Dismissive Rhetoric
By alleging that U.S. Congress members are motivated by financial gain, the Pakistani government risks alienating key allies and worsening its diplomatic isolation. Such tactics may hinder Pakistan’s capacity to engage constructively with international partners, complicating efforts to address critical human rights issues.
Downplaying the significance of the Congressional initiative could prove counterproductive, as it fails to recognize the serious nature of the concerns raised. The U.S. Congress has increasingly demonstrated its willingness to hold foreign leaders accountable for human rights violations, and dismissing these efforts as mere propaganda can weaken Pakistan’s standing in the international community. The lack of substantive engagement with these criticisms underscores a disconnect between the government’s narrative and the realities many Pakistanis face.
If the Pakistani government continues to issue unfounded accusations without addressing the legitimate concerns raised by U.S. lawmakers, it risks further deteriorating its relationship with Washington. The credibility of Pakistan’s governance is increasingly scrutinized, particularly regarding its commitment to democratic norms and human rights.
It is crucial for the Pakistani government to reassess its strategy in responding to international criticism. Rather than resorting to allegations of bribery and external manipulation, a more constructive approach would involve engaging with the U.S. on urgent human rights and governance issues. Acknowledging the legitimacy of international concerns and committing to meaningful reform could help restore Pakistan’s credibility and foster a more favorable political climate.