In a bold move to curb deceptive marketing practices, the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has imposed substantial penalties on two multinational giants, Unilever Pakistan and FrieslandCampina Engro. The fines, amounting to Rs75 million ($269,530) each, target the companies’ advertising strategies that misrepresented their “frozen desserts” as “ice cream,” a violation with significant implications for consumer rights and corporate accountability.
Deceptive Marketing Practices Unveiled
The crackdown by the CCP came in response to a formal complaint filed by Pakistan Fruit Juice Company, the makers of Hico Ice Cream. The complaint accused the two companies of exploiting consumer ignorance by labeling and advertising their products as “ice cream,” despite the products falling under the category of “frozen desserts.”
The CCP’s investigation revealed that frozen desserts, made primarily from vegetable oils and other non-dairy ingredients, were falsely marketed as ice cream—a product exclusively made from milk and cream. This misleading advertising created a false equivalence between the two categories, eroding consumer trust and violating established food standards.
The commission explicitly condemned the companies for manipulating public perception, stating:
“A false and misleading impression of ‘frozen dessert’ as ‘ice cream’ was created and continued by the respondents through their advertisements, in order to make consumers believe that ‘frozen dessert’ products are also ‘ice cream.’”
Regulatory Standards and Global Precedents
The CCP’s ruling is grounded in the Pakistan Standards and Quality Control Authority (PSQCA) guidelines and the Punjab Pure Food Regulations 2018. These regulations clearly delineate the composition and labeling of “ice cream” and “frozen desserts,” prohibiting any conflation of the two categories.
Under these standards:
- Ice cream must be made from milk, cream, or other dairy products.
- Frozen desserts are produced from a mix of pasteurized ingredients, including edible vegetable oils, and do not qualify as dairy-based products.
The CCP also referenced international standards from jurisdictions such as the United States, Australia, and India, where regulatory bodies similarly mandate that only dairy-based products can be marketed as “ice cream.” The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the United States has previously penalized companies for analogous misbranding practices, reinforcing the global consensus against such deceptive marketing.
Corporate Accountability and Consumer Protection
The CCP’s order requires Unilever Pakistan and FrieslandCampina Engro to cease all advertising that misrepresents frozen desserts as ice cream. The companies have been directed to:
- Remove misleading advertisements from digital and print platforms.
- Provide transparent disclosures about the true nature and composition of their products.
The ruling further stipulates that failure to comply within 30 days will result in additional fines, emphasizing the commission’s commitment to enforcing corporate accountability.
The penalties extend beyond product misrepresentation. Unilever Pakistan was fined an additional Rs20 million for airing false comparisons, claiming their frozen desserts were healthier than dairy-based ice creams—a violation of Section 10 of the Competition Act.
Economic Implications and Industry Impact
The penalties represent more than just a financial setback for these multinational corporations. They signify a broader challenge to exploitative practices that prioritize profits over consumer welfare. By leveraging deceptive marketing, these companies not only gained an unfair economic advantage but also distorted market competition at the expense of smaller, compliant manufacturers like Hico.
The case underscores the growing tensions between multinational corporations and regulatory authorities in Pakistan. While companies like Unilever Pakistan have attempted to position themselves as responsible advertisers, repeated violations and subsequent penalties paint a different picture. Earlier this year, the CCP fined Unilever Rs60 million for misleading claims in advertisements for hygiene products, a decision the company vowed to challenge.
Read More: Sentencing of Civilians by Military Courts in Pakistan A Grave Violation of Justice
A Precedent for Ethical Marketing
The CCP’s decision has sparked debate about corporate ethics and the role of regulatory bodies in ensuring transparency. Consumer advocacy groups have welcomed the ruling, calling it a much-needed step toward protecting public interests.
By holding powerful corporations accountable, the CCP has sent a clear message: deceptive practices will not be tolerated. This precedent is likely to pressure other players in the food and beverage industry to reassess their marketing strategies and prioritize compliance with regulatory standards.
However, the penalties also highlight the need for stronger enforcement mechanisms and consumer education initiatives. Without widespread awareness, consumers remain vulnerable to similar tactics, undermining the efficacy of such rulings.
A Turning Point in Consumer Protection
The CCP’s action against Unilever Pakistan and FrieslandCampina Engro marks a pivotal moment in Pakistan’s regulatory landscape. By taking a firm stance against deceptive marketing, the commission has reaffirmed its commitment to consumer rights and market integrity.
As the ripple effects of this ruling unfold, it is evident that the era of unchecked corporate practices is coming to an end. For multinational corporations operating in Pakistan, the message is clear: ethical marketing is not optional—it’s a legal and moral obligation.