The trial and sentencing of civilians by military courts in Pakistan represents an alarming and grotesque abuse of state power, with far-reaching implications for the country’s legal and political future. The military’s recent decision to convict 25 individuals involved in the May 9, 2023, attacks on military installations, sentencing them to terms ranging from 2 to 10 years, is nothing less than a travesty of justice. This act, cloaked in the rhetoric of national security and political order, is, in fact, an assault on the fundamental rights of civilians and a clear violation of Pakistan’s constitutional framework.
A Grave Violation of Constitutional Rights
The most glaring issue with these military trials is the simple fact that civilians are being tried by military courts. Under Pakistan’s Constitution, civilians are to be tried in civilian courts, where the due process of law is supposed to safeguard their rights. Yet, under the influence of the military, Pakistan has now witnessed the dismantling of these protections.
The trials, which were originally halted by the Supreme Court, were revived under immense pressure from the military establishment, culminating in the sentencing of individuals who, according to the opposition, had no place in a military court. This situation is exacerbated by the fact that the military courts, often criticized for their lack of transparency and fairness, are effectively functioning as kangaroo courts, with verdicts that appear predetermined and devoid of impartiality.
The Pretext of May 9
The events of May 9, 2023, were triggered by the arrest of PTI leader Imran Khan, leading to widespread protests and clashes. While the military and government narrative paints a picture of politically-motivated violence and anarchy, the reality is far more complex. The ruling elite, primarily the military, have used these attacks as a convenient pretext to unleash a campaign of repression against civilians. This is not about upholding law and order; it is about consolidating power and punishing dissent.
Imran Khan’s arrest and the subsequent unrest have been framed as a challenge to the state’s authority. The military’s propaganda machine, represented by the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), has consistently referred to the attacks on military installations as “politically orchestrated,” furthering the narrative that the violence was a deliberate attempt to undermine the state. However, this narrative ignores the deeper issues at play, including the pervasive influence of the military in Pakistan’s politics, its dominance over the judiciary, and the ongoing suppression of political freedoms.
The Persecution of Political Dissent
The military establishment’s use of violence as a tool for maintaining control is nothing new. The May 9 events are simply the latest in a long history of political repression. The military’s ability to frame political opposition as a threat to national security is not only a tool for silencing critics but also a means of diverting attention from its own role in the political turmoil that Pakistan endures. The sentences handed down to these civilians are not just about punishing violence; they are about sending a message to any potential future dissenters: the military will not hesitate to crush opposition under the guise of national security.
Opposition parties, particularly the PTI, have rejected these sentences, decrying them as a violation of human rights. Political leaders like Omar Ayub have described the military trials as a direct assault on the principle of judicial independence, which lies at the heart of Pakistan’s democratic system. Military courts, they argue, cannot be entrusted with the responsibility of judging civilians for what are essentially civil offenses. The use of military tribunals is a clear attempt to sidestep the constitutional requirement that civilians be tried in civilian courts, where they can expect a fair trial under the rule of law.
The Military’s Self-Righteous Narrative
The ISPR has gone to great lengths to frame the May 9 events as an existential threat to the state, calling it an act of political terrorism. This narrative, however, collapses under scrutiny. The attacks on military installations, including the General Headquarters (GHQ), are indeed serious offenses, but the portrayal of these acts as an unprovoked assault on the nation’s institutions conveniently overlooks the broader political context. What the ISPR fails to address is the role of the military in Pakistan’s perpetual political crisis—its direct involvement in suppressing democratic processes, manipulating elections, and curbing free speech.
Moreover, the idea that the convicts’ sentences represent an “important milestone” in the dispensation of justice is an absurdity. These sentences are not a victory for justice; they are an indication of the military’s unchecked power. The conviction rates in military courts are disproportionately high, with no acquittals reported so far. This fact alone casts serious doubts on the fairness of these proceedings, which appear to be a rubber-stamp exercise rather than a genuine legal process.
The International and Domestic Outrage
The military’s actions have drawn sharp criticism both domestically and internationally. The United States chapter of PTI, in particular, has denounced the trials, claiming that civilians were subjected to inhumane conditions and tortured into giving false confessions. The international community must take note of these violations, which have been carried out under the pretext of upholding law and order. Human rights organizations have condemned the military courts’ role in suppressing dissent and denying the accused their right to a fair trial.
Read More: Pakistan Rejects New US Sanctions as a Threat to Regional Stability
In Pakistan, constitutional lawyers and human rights activists are sounding the alarm about the state of the country’s judicial independence. Barrister Asad Rahim has warned that the military’s encroachment on civilian legal proceedings undermines Pakistan’s constitutional order. Lawyers like Basil Nabi Malik have described the military trials as an abomination for any country that claims to be a democracy. The lack of transparency in these trials and the absence of independent oversight are glaring violations of basic human rights.
The sentencing of civilians by military courts is a stark reminder of the growing authoritarianism in Pakistan. The military’s grip on power is tightening, and the country’s democratic institutions are being systematically undermined. What we are witnessing is not a fight for justice, but a calculated move by the military to quash dissent, maintain control, and solidify its dominance in Pakistan’s political landscape. The May 9 events are being used as a pretext to justify these abuses, but the real danger lies in the broader implications for Pakistan’s future. If this trend