Are Hybrids and Electric Vehicles More Dangerous to Pedestrians?
In recent years, the United States has seen a concerning rise in pedestrian deaths, with various factors potentially contributing to this alarming trend. Among these factors, a new study conducted in the UK reveals that hybrids and electric vehicles (EVs) pose a higher risk to pedestrians compared to vehicles with combustion engines. Specifically, the study shows that EVs are twice as likely to strike pedestrians and up to three times more likely to do so in urban areas.
Before delving deeper into this issue, it is essential to clarify that this is not an attempt to vilify EVs. Instead, it aims to shed light on an important safety concern. EVs are generally quieter than their gas-powered counterparts, making it more challenging for pedestrians to hear them approaching, despite regulations requiring EVs to emit a sound at low speeds. Moreover, younger and less experienced drivers tend to operate these vehicles more frequently.
While the UK study emphasizes the risks associated with EVs, it is worth noting that a 2017 report conducted by the US Department of Transportation also highlighted the higher risk of hybrids and EVs when compared to internal combustion cars. According to the US study, these vehicles pose a 20 percent greater risk on average, which increases to 50 percent during low-speed maneuvers.
Phil Edwards, one of the authors of the UK study, underscores the hazard EVs pose to pedestrians due to their reduced audibility compared to petrol or diesel cars. He asserts that if governments plan to phase out the sale of traditional vehicles in favor of electrification, they must address these risks adequately. Edwards emphasizes that drivers transitioning to EVs must be extra cautious, recognizing that these vehicles differ significantly from conventional cars in terms of noise level.
Additionally, Edwards points out two other factors contributing to the higher risk associated with EVs. Firstly, their stronger acceleration capabilities may result in unexpected encounters between pedestrians and vehicles. Secondly, EVs tend to have greater weight, which can increase their stopping distances, further exacerbating the risk of accidents.
To ensure the successful promotion of electrification while prioritizing pedestrian safety, Edwards suggests that governments should impose more robust requirements and regulations. These measures might include enhancing the audibility of EVs and implementing additional safety features to mitigate the risks for pedestrians.
In conclusion, while hybrids and EVs offer numerous benefits in terms of sustainability and reduced emissions, it is vital to address the safety concerns surrounding these vehicles. Both the UK and US studies suggest that EVs pose a higher risk to pedestrians, largely due to their quieter nature and other associated factors. It is essential for governments and manufacturers to work together to implement effective solutions that prioritize pedestrian safety without undermining the progress and potential of electrified transportation.
