The Mercedes-AMG GT is a highly anticipated sports car that has undergone significant changes in its second generation. However, it seems that some of these changes may not have been well-received by potential buyers. The car manufacturer often relies heavily on customer feedback to shape the design and features of their vehicles, but this approach may result in a form of confirmation bias. In other words, they focus too much on the opinions of existing owners and fail to consider the perspectives of potential customers like David, a 59-year-old from East Sussex.
David was initially attracted to the previous model of the Mercedes-AMG GT but ultimately decided to purchase a Porsche 911 instead. His decision was influenced by a test drive experience that left him feeling unsettled on a bumpy and damp road. David’s opinion, and the opinions of others like him, may hold valuable insights for car manufacturers. After all, these are the individuals who are considering making a discretionary purchase and their feedback should not be ignored.
The second-generation Mercedes-AMG GT has made several fundamental changes from its predecessor. It shares many similarities with the Mercedes-AMG SL roadster, including cabin architecture, engines, and an aluminum spaceframe chassis. However, this lack of differentiation between models may limit the car’s appeal to a wider range of sports car enthusiasts. The addition of four-wheel drive and rear seats to the GT may enhance its usability but does little to make it tamer or more subtle.
In terms of design, the new GT has grown in size to offer more interior space and accommodate rear seats. Its exterior styling still retains some familiarity with the previous model, allowing it to maintain its identity despite numerous alterations to body panels and details.
Under the hood, the GT is equipped with AMG’s twin-turbocharged 4.0-liter V8 engine in two different power outputs. The performance and delivery of this engine are exceptional, providing a thrilling driving experience. The new nine-speed automatic gearbox is also a notable improvement, offering fast and precise shifts.
However, the GT’s ride and handling leave something to be desired, especially on UK roads. The suspension is firm, resulting in a coarse secondary ride that limits its grand touring appeal. The steering is direct but feels overly responsive, which can be unnerving in more dynamic drive modes.
In terms of practicality, the GT offers decent usability with its large boot and occasional back seats. However, the cabin layout lacks the exotic and special feel of its predecessor. The interior ambiance is more typical of a Mercedes rather than something extraordinary.
When it comes to running costs, the GT’s standard equipment level is impressive, but the higher-end models come at a steep price. The decision to only offer higher-end derivatives in the UK market has raised the entry-level price significantly.
Overall, the Mercedes-AMG GT remains a striking and highly capable sports car that excels in delivering thrilling performance. It may not be as refined or subtle as some of its rivals, but it offers a raw and exciting driving experience. Potential buyers should be aware of its firm ride and overly responsive steering, as well as its higher price point compared to other sports cars in its class.
In conclusion, car manufacturers should take into account the opinions and feedback of a diverse range of potential customers when developing new models. While existing owners’ perspectives are valuable, they should not be prioritized at the expense of broader market appeal. The Mercedes-AMG GT is an impressive sports car, but it may not suit everyone’s preferences or requirements.