The complaint states that Voodoo uses bots to fix the results of in-game tournaments. Additionally, Voodoo claims that its Blitz game is only played against human opponents, even though it actually utilizes bots. The company also falsely asserts that it does not profit from the outcome of matches and that it is only available to users aged 21 and older. Skillz argues that all of these statements made by Voodoo are false and misleading.
Skillz CEO Andrew Paradise has been vocal about the company’s commitment to combating fraudulent bot usage in the gaming industry. He believes that eliminating systemic fraud is crucial for creating a fairer future in gaming, benefiting both consumers and the industry as a whole. The damages caused by Voodoo’s alleged behavior have had a significant impact on Skillz, resulting in lost customers, market share, revenue, and profits.
This is not the first time Skillz has taken legal action against companies engaging in deceptive practices. In May, the company settled a patent infringement lawsuit against AviaGames, which involved allegations of bot usage to defraud players. The jury awarded Skillz $42.9 million in damages, and this case has sparked a federal investigation into Avia’s activities. Skillz has also filed a lawsuit against Papaya Gaming for their alleged use of bots in games marketed as “skill-based.”
Skillz’s determination to address bot usage in the gaming industry demonstrates its commitment to ensuring fair gameplay for its users. By taking legal action against companies like Voodoo, Skillz aims to protect its customers and promote transparency in the mobile gaming space. The outcome of these lawsuits will have a significant impact on the future of the industry, potentially leading to stricter regulations and improved gaming experiences for players.