Advertising

SpaceX President Urges Brazilian Judicial Figure to Stop Harassment of Starlink

## SpaceX President Pleads for End to Harassment of Starlink

SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell recently made a public plea to a top judicial figure in Brazil, urging him to “please stop harassing Starlink” amidst an ongoing battle against Elon Musk’s social media business, X. This plea comes in the midst of a months-long dispute between Musk and the Brazilian courts, which have accused X of spreading extremism and misinformation. In response to X’s refusal to comply with court orders to remove certain accounts, the Supreme Court of Brazil ordered a country-wide suspension of the platform. This ban was unanimously upheld earlier this week with the support of Brazil’s President.

However, the feud between Musk and the Brazilian courts has extended to his other businesses, including SpaceX, which sells its satellite internet service, Starlink, in the country. Following the ban on X, Brazil froze Starlink’s company accounts to ensure that X pays over $3 million in fines owed to Brazilian courts. The court’s order specifically targets Starlink Brazil Holding Ltda and Starlink Brazil Servicos de Internet Ltda, which have provided internet access to approximately 250,000 customers in underserved regions of the country since January 2022. Brazil is one of Starlink’s largest markets outside of North America.

SpaceX has not yet responded to inquiries regarding this matter. Additionally, the court has issued an order demanding that Starlink block access to X, initially leading to Starlink’s refusal to comply. However, the satellite communications firm reversed its decision a day later and announced that it would adhere to the court’s order.

In a statement on X, Starlink expressed its belief that the order freezing its assets is based on an “unfounded determination” that the company is responsible for fines imposed on X. The company also revealed that it has initiated legal proceedings in Brazil against the order. Despite the freezing of assets, Starlink assured that it would comply with the court’s order to block access to X in Brazil.

The situation has prompted SpaceX to send an email to its employees advising against traveling to Brazil, even for personal reasons. The company is also relocating a small group of employees who are based in Brazil. This development, along with Shotwell’s plea, highlights the complex financial and geopolitical entanglement faced by Musk’s various businesses. It demonstrates that political leaders and regulators may not hesitate to issue penalties against his enterprises, regardless of whether they are directly involved in a dispute.

The ongoing conflict between Musk, X, and the Brazilian courts raises important questions about the role of social media platforms in disseminating information and the power of governments to regulate them. It also highlights the potential consequences that businesses associated with controversial figures like Musk may face. As governments worldwide grapple with the challenges posed by social media platforms, it is crucial to strike a balance between freedom of expression and the need to combat misinformation and extremism.

Ultimately, the outcome of this battle in Brazil may set a precedent for how other countries choose to address similar situations. The actions taken by the Brazilian courts and the response from Musk’s businesses will likely shape the future of digital communication and the regulation of social media platforms. As this complex situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how it will impact the trajectory of SpaceX, Starlink, and X, as well as the broader discussions surrounding freedom of speech and online accountability.