Headlight Brightness and Glare: A Growing Issue on the Roads
Introduction:
The issue of headlight brightness and glare has gained attention recently, with many drivers expressing concern. The government has taken notice and plans to address the problem. However, finding a quick legislative fix may not be easy. The Department for Transport has been in discussions with a United Nations expert group on vehicle lighting, but proposed solutions like automatic beam alignment won’t be implemented until 2027. Even advanced “intelligent” lighting systems in some cars have not fully resolved the issue. So, what can be done in the meantime?
The Need for a Solution:
The majority of new cars lack a switch to manually lower the beams, making it challenging for drivers to address their own glare. Additionally, replacing the bulbs in modern headlight units is not a viable option. However, there might be a solution from the past. In France, before the 1990s, drivers used to apply yellow paint to their headlights to reduce brightness and glare. This not only provided a more appropriate glow but also had practical benefits. Yellow light has a longer wavelength, making it easier to see and reducing reflection off water surfaces. While further scientific investigation is needed, this historical practice could hold some merit.
The Potential Impact of EV Tax Breaks:
The Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT) has suggested halving VAT on electric cars for three years as a way to boost demand and promote cleaner air. While this may seem like a sensible idea, the financial implications are significant. With 1.2 million zero-emission cars expected to be sold over three years, the tax break would amount to £5 billion. However, it’s important to consider that most private buyers would spend less than £50,000 on an electric vehicle, resulting in lower VAT amounts. The exact impact on the public purse is difficult to quantify but is likely to be significant. This raises the question of whether it is fair for the less affluent to subsidize the wealthy.
Consideration for the Less Affluent:
It is crucial to remember that many individuals, particularly those at the start of their careers, face financial challenges. High rental costs, fuel taxes, and limited disposable income make it difficult for them to save or invest in expensive vehicles. Asking them to forego public services or make up the difference to subsidize EV tax breaks for wealthier individuals seems unfair. The disparity between the rich and the poor is already significant, and implementing such tax breaks could further exacerbate this divide.
Conclusion:
Headlight brightness and glare present a growing problem on the roads, and finding an effective solution is crucial. While legislative fixes may take time, exploring historical practices like applying yellow paint to headlights could offer temporary relief. When it comes to EV tax breaks, careful consideration must be given to the financial burden on the less affluent. Balancing the need for cleaner air with fairness and affordability is essential to ensuring a more equitable society.