Reinstating Net Neutrality: Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet
Introduction:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has officially voted to reinstate net neutrality, passing an order titled “Safeguarding and Securing the Open Internet.” This decision restores, with some modifications and protections, the rules that were passed in 2015. The FCC’s goal is to enforce basic rules of connectivity and fairness in broadband.
The Inevitable Vote:
Since September, when the FCC announced its pursuit of reinstating net neutrality, it was expected that the vote would pass. With a split of 3-2 in favor of the Democrats, there was no real reason for the Commission to vote against it. Therefore, Thursday’s vote was a significant milestone on the road forward.
Addressing Old Arguments:
The usual arguments against net neutrality, such as heavy-handed regulation and stifling innovation, have resurfaced. However, these arguments lack substance, as Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel points out. The FCC already exerts rules in other areas and has not been overwhelmed by draconian regulations. In fact, the FCC has taken action to protect national security by stripping wireless providers affiliated with Chinese state actors of their ability to operate in the U.S.
Inconsistencies and Domestic Issues:
Chairwoman Rosenworcel highlights the senseless inconsistencies in recent years. While the FCC took action against state-affiliated Chinese carriers exploiting internet routing protocols, it had limited power when it came to broadband. This highlights the need for a national net neutrality policy to address both domestic and international concerns.
The Impact of Broadband Redefinition:
The FCC recently redefined broadband as having a minimum speed of 100 megabits up and 25 down. This change benefits consumers by ensuring they receive higher speeds without additional costs. Without this redefinition, consumers would have continued paying more for lower speeds.
Zero Rating and Bundling:
Zero rating, where certain services are not counted towards bandwidth caps, is another issue addressed by the FCC’s net neutrality rules. This practice can lead to unfair bundling between corporations, particularly in the era of streaming. The FCC’s intervention ensures that consumers have a fair and open internet experience.
The Importance of a National Net Neutrality Policy:
Chairwoman Rosenworcel emphasizes the need for a national net neutrality policy in today’s digital economy. It is crucial that the nation’s communications expert, the FCC, has the authority to act when it comes to broadband. Establishing a national rule as a baseline for protections seems like the bare minimum, as demonstrated by California’s own state net neutrality rules.
Challenges and Future Outlook:
While the reinstated net neutrality rules are a step in the right direction, they are far from secure. These rules will face challenges in court, and their fate may depend on the outcome of future elections. However, under a friendly administration, these rules could become enshrined in law during the next term.
Consumer Impact and Industry Behavior:
It will take some time for the rules to take effect, as they need to be published in the Federal Register and undergo a waiting period. However, consumers are unlikely to notice any significant changes once the rules are implemented. Companies that previously attempted to interfere with broadband traffic have realized that it is not worth the risk due to consumer backlash and federal protections. They have been on their best behavior, claiming they haven’t engaged in anti-consumer practices for years, but consumers shouldn’t believe them.
Conclusion:
The FCC’s vote to reinstate net neutrality marks an important step in safeguarding the open internet. Chairwoman Rosenworcel’s call for a national net neutrality policy highlights the need for consistency and protection in the digital economy. While challenges lie ahead, these rules have the potential to shape a fair and open internet landscape for years to come.