The Problems with Level-One Autonomous Driving Functions
In a recent online post, Michael van der Sande, Alpine’s managing director, expressed his concerns about level-one autonomous driving functions. He described them as a “nightmare” due to their confusing and unsafe nature. Van der Sande cited instances of speed warning systems getting limits wrong, multiple emergency braking alerts, and unwarranted steering assistance interventions. He argued that these functions not only distract drivers but also make the car less safe than previous generations. His criticisms highlight a problem that many industry insiders hesitate to address openly, as they have cars to sell. However, it is crucial for legislators and those mandating this technology to listen to these concerns and take action.
The Distractions of New Car Functionality
Van der Sande also criticized the placement of basic functions, such as air vent speed controls, hidden on the second page of a center screen. He argued that this design choice creates a perfect storm of distractions that can compromise safety. These frustrations with the design of new car functionality are shared by many, but few are willing to speak out about it. Van der Sande’s comments bring attention to a pressing issue in the automotive industry. As cars become more technologically advanced, it is essential that user-friendly interfaces and controls are prioritized to ensure a seamless and safe driving experience.
The Importance of Speaking Out
Van der Sande’s willingness to speak out against level-one autonomous driving functions is commendable. It is crucial for industry professionals to voice their concerns and advocate for safer and more user-friendly technologies. By doing so, they can influence legislators and decision-makers to prioritize these issues. While the industry may be hesitant to openly criticize these technologies, it is essential to address the shortcomings to drive meaningful change.
Conclusion
Michael van der Sande’s criticisms of level-one autonomous driving functions shed light on the challenges and safety concerns associated with these technologies. His comments serve as a reminder that the industry must prioritize user-friendly interfaces and controls to ensure a safe driving experience. It is crucial for industry professionals to speak out against inadequate and frustrating technology to drive positive change. By doing so, they can influence legislators and decision-makers to prioritize safety and user experience in future automotive technologies.