Introduction:
Adobe has launched a beta version of Photoshop with new generative AI features that allow users to generate and edit images from text prompts. While these tools make it easier for both novices and professionals to bring their ideas to life, there are concerns surrounding the use of training data and the potential impact on creative professionals.
Generative AI Features in Photoshop:
The new Generate Image tool in Adobe Photoshop enables users to create an image from a text prompt, providing a starting point for those feeling overwhelmed by a blank page. Users can now generate entire images simply by inputting a text prompt. This feature is particularly helpful for rookies who may struggle to come up with ideas independently.
Additionally, the Generative Fill tool has been enhanced with a Reference Image feature. This allows users to upload an image with a specific aesthetic or motif and have the tool build off that aesthetic. This feature offers greater control and customization options for users, making it easier to achieve the desired result.
Controversy Surrounding Training Data:
The issue of training data for AI models has become a contentious topic. Companies like Google and OpenAI have faced lawsuits for training their models on copyrighted works. While Adobe has positioned its Firefly Image 3 model as an ethical alternative, recent reports suggest that the training data used includes AI-generated images derived from competitors like Midjourney, which have been accused of infringing upon copyrighted works.
According to a Bloomberg report, around 13 percent of Adobe’s stock library consists of AI-generated content used to train Firefly. While Adobe claims that their generative AI models are trained on licensed and public domain content, there are concerns about the potential infringement and lack of compensation for artists and photographers whose work may have been used.
Impact on Creative Professionals:
Creative professionals have expressed concerns about the Reference Image tool, as it allows users to create images based on the work of photographers and artists without proper acknowledgment or compensation. This has sparked outrage among some users who feel that this tool enables plagiarism and undermines the hard work and expenses incurred by original creators.
Adobe’s Response:
Adobe has defended its practices by stating that contributors are compensated through Stock royalties and a bonus program that incentivizes users to contribute to Firefly training. The company also claims to have a multi-layered, continuous review and moderation process to ensure compliance with intellectual property guidelines.
Conclusion:
While Adobe’s new generative AI features in Photoshop offer exciting possibilities for users, there are valid concerns about the use of training data and potential implications for creative professionals. The ethical use of AI models and the fair compensation of original creators should be at the forefront of these discussions. As AI continues to advance, it is essential to strike a balance between innovation and respect for intellectual property rights.
