On Friday, the US House of Representatives passed, with a 344 to 81 vote majority, a historic $696 billion defense policy bill that would exceed President Trump’s budget request spilling over long-standing limits imposed on the US defense spending.
The bill is causing alarm bells to go off in Islamabad as it includes provisions to restrict US aid to Pakistan.
All but eight Republicans and 117 Democrats voted for the bill, which surpasses the $549bn cap on defense spending set under the 2011 Budget Control Act by about $72bn.
Another congressional panel, on Thursday, approved the State and Foreign Operations bill that also suggests tightening restrictions on US civil and military assistance to Pakistan. The foreign affairs bill will now be put forth to the full House for voting.
The defense bill authorizes $696bn in defense spending for the 2018 fiscal year, including nearly $30bn more for core Pentagon operations than President Donald Trump requested.
All but eight Republicans and 117 Democrats voted for the bill, which surpasses the $549bn cap on defense spending set under the 2011 Budget Control Act by about $72bn.
Read more: How the USA ensures that its ‘desired parties’ are elected abroad
The other legislation, however, would reduce funding for the State Department and foreign operations by $10bn, down from about $57.4bn in fiscal 2017. Still, the cuts are not as severe as those in the Trump administration’s budget proposal, which included roughly $37bn for the state.
In April, US Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, while addressing America’s NATO allies in Brussels, said that an eventual settlement between the Afghan government and the Taliban is the ultimate goal of the Trump administration.
In total, the bill provides $47.4bn in both regular discretionary and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funding. The current budget total is $10bn below the fiscal year 2017 enacted level when counting additional funds provided in the Security Assistance Appropriations Act of 2017.
Within this amount, OCO funding totals $12bn, which supports operations and assistance in areas of conflict, such as Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan.
The bill’s wording, released earlier this week, includes clauses to make the civil and military aid to Pakistan conditional to Islamabad stopping its alleged support to the Haqqani network and other militant groups in the South Asian regions.
Read more: Of promises, meddling and delusions: the story of Pak-USA ties
Although the text focuses on the groups that fight the US and official Afghan forces in Afghanistan, some groups named in the text are also supposedly operating in the Indian occupied Kashmir.
In recent days, senior American officials including congressmen, intelligence officers, and government representatives have sent clear messages to Pakistan, urging it to help the United States and the Afghan government defeat the Taliban militants. They also said that the failure to do so would force the United States to reconsider its relationship with Pakistan.
Although in power since Jan 20, the Trump administration is still In the process of finalizing a conclusive policy for the Pak-Afghan region and recent leaks to the media indicate that while the new strategy would suggest both “qualitative and numerical” increase in US military presence in Afghanistan, it will also continue to seek a negotiated settlement to the Afghan conflict.
Interestingly US officials and lawmakers have left open the option to hold peace talks with the Taliban.
In April, US Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, while addressing America’s NATO allies in Brussels, said that an eventual settlement between the Afghan government and the Taliban is the ultimate goal of the Trump administration.
“The ongoing commitment of NATO allies and partners to peace in Afghanistan, including to an eventual settlement between the Afghan government and the Taliban, protects this alliance’s interests, and, when successful, ensures that Afghanistan never again becomes a safe haven for terrorists,” he said.
Read more: USA-Russia-China triangle
Although in power since Jan 20, the Trump administration is still In the process of finalizing a conclusive policy for the Pak-Afghan region and recent leaks to the media indicate that while the new strategy would suggest both “qualitative and numerical” increase in US military presence in Afghanistan, it will also continue to seek a negotiated settlement to the Afghan conflict.
At a recent news briefing, State Department Spokesperson Heather Nauert avoided categorizing the Taliban as a terrorist outfit.
“Our Afghan policy review is still under way. That has not been announced just yet,” said Ms. Nauert when asked if the Trump administration is going to brand the Taliban as terrorists.